Jantar Mantar 2.0 Movement Intensifies as Supreme Court Steps In and Activists Refuse to Back Down
Following their release from custody by an executive magistrate court on peace-keeping conditions, CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke alongside co-conveners Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka addressed the media to set the record straight, asserting that they had signed no legal bonds forfeiting their right to peaceful demonstration.
While speaking to reporters in Nagpur, Dipke described egregious procedural lapses during his detention, noting that police officers woke him in the dead of night to contact his parents and repeatedly restricted access to legal representation and personal communication regarding the death of his grandmother, an account the police contested by stating that the family tragedy was conveyed with promptness and assistance.
Concurrently, party leaders asserted at the Press Club of India that police intimidation and physical force would not derail their collective resolve, with Das emphasizing that administrative agencies had chosen to curb civil liberties rather than establish dialogue.
The unfolding events in the capital also saw several key public figures drawn into the center of the confrontation. Prominent digital commentator Dhruv Rathee, who was released after being detained from Gurugram by plainclothes police, publicly affirmed that he had entered into no undertakings or conditional bonds, remarking that the aggressive nature of his detention disregarded basic civilian due process. Demonstrations spilled into major transit corridors as All India Students’ Association national president Neha Bora led marches from RK Ashram Marg toward Connaught Place before being taken into custody, sharing video dispatches that criticized the containment of students inside police vehicles and posting a lighthearted comment on social media regarding police confusion over an alleged lookalike. Simultaneously, Students’ Federation of India national leaders, including president Adarsh M. Saji, faced detention near Rajiv Chowk, while Left student alliances pledged to turn every police barricade into a public assembly zone.
The administration’s handling of the protests drew sharp national scrutiny from opposition leaders and civil society. Aam Aadmi Party leaders Arvind Kejriwal, Gopal Rai, and Sanjay Singh pointed out that police forces had acted with undue force against peaceful demonstrators, female students, legal professionals, and journalists, stating that more than 6,000 individuals were detained on Saturday alone. The CPI(M) condemned the physical distress caused to Rajya Sabha MP John Brittas, who had to be assisted onto public transport following a police confrontation, while actor Prakash Raj criticized the government for turning the entire capital into an involuntary protest camp. In response, Bharatiya Janata Party national spokesperson Sudhanshu Trivedi defended the administration's stance, arguing that opposition figures were attempting to stir division and destabilize civic order for political mileage.
Parallel to these street developments, the legal battle reached the apex judiciary during a rare Sunday hearing. Taking stern view of the total civic disruption caused by multi-tiered barricades, train cancellations, and the closure of dozens of metro stations, a special Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana ordered the immediate restoration of all metro rail services, passenger trains, undisturbed internet connectivity, and normal civilian movement. Reaffirming the bench's earlier caution against using excessive force to deal with a peaceful protest, the court prohibited the detention of peaceful and unarmed citizens outside emergency zones notified under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. Furthermore, with Delhi Police confirming the registration of 20 First Information Reports alongside assault arrests linked to the agitations, the court issued formal contempt of court notices to Union Home Secretary Govind Mohan, Delhi Police Commissioner Anurag Kumar, and DMRC Chairperson D. Thara, demanding their compliance reports by Tuesday.
0 Response to "Jantar Mantar 2.0 Movement Intensifies as Supreme Court Steps In and Activists Refuse to Back Down"
Post a Comment
Disclaimer Note:
The views expressed in the articles published here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy, position, or perspective of Kalimpong News or KalimNews. Kalimpong News and KalimNews disclaim all liability for the published or posted articles, news, and information and assume no responsibility for the accuracy or validity of the content.
Kalimpong News is a non-profit online news platform managed by KalimNews and operated under the Kalimpong Press Club.
Comment Policy:
We encourage respectful and constructive discussions. Please ensure decency while commenting and register with your email ID to participate.
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.