Delhi High Court Declines Urgent Stay on Probe Against Woman Journalist in ACP’s Complaint
Justice Mini Pushkarna, due to paucity of time, said it could not pass any order without hearing the police side and added that the matter would be heard after the Dussehra vacation.
The high court will remain closed from October 19 to October 26.
Earlier, the journalist had filed a sexual assault complaint against the officer, Assistant Commissioner of Police Vivek Bhagat. Her complaint is being investigated by Delhi Police's Crime Branch.
As the counsel for the petitioner urged the court to pass an order staying the investigation in the case, the judge said, "No, not like this. I cannot pass any order without hearing them."
"I cannot pass any such order like this. On the urgency expressed by the petitioners' counsel, list on October 27," the judge said.
The counsel for the journalist said that it was a matter that deserved an order that day directing a complete stay on the investigation in the FIR.
He also apprised the court that on Thursday, the Supreme Court directed that no coercive action be taken against the journalist and added that the counsel for the State should give an assurance before the high court that they would not proceed against her.
He said the FIR filed by the ACP was lodged only to intimidate the woman into not pursuing her complaint against him. The journalist's petition was filed by advocate Saimon Farooqui.
During the brief hearing, the counsel for the State submitted that the journalist was already protected by the apex court.
The court also adjourned another plea by the journalist's male colleague seeking the quashing of an FIR registered against him.
Delhi Police has registered the FIR against the independent journalist and others on a complaint filed by ACP Bhagat, posted at Connaught Place sub-division of New Delhi district, who alleged casteist remarks, public humiliation and defamation directed at him during the protest.
The FIR was registered under relevant provisions of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and Sections 221 (obstructing a public servant from discharging duty), 356(2) (defamation) and 3(5) (common intention) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).
According to the FIR, Bhagat was performing law and order duty near Buta Singh roundabout near Jantar Mantar on October 3 when he allegedly overheard the woman journalist making derogatory remarks about his Megh/Meghwal caste in public and questioning his appointment as an ACP.
The complainant alleged that he ignored the remarks and continued performing his official duties.
However, around 3 pm the same day, the journalist allegedly accused him of sexual assault during the handling and detention of protesters and repeatedly confronted him, along with her colleagues, thereby obstructing his official work.
Bhagat also alleged that the journalist and some members of the Cockroach Janta Party, including Abhijeet Dipke, Ashutosh Ranka, Saurav Das and Ratna Singh, circulated posts and reels on social media platforms X and Instagram accusing him.
0 Response to "Delhi High Court Declines Urgent Stay on Probe Against Woman Journalist in ACP’s Complaint"
Post a Comment
Disclaimer Note:
The views expressed in the articles published here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy, position, or perspective of Kalimpong News or KalimNews. Kalimpong News and KalimNews disclaim all liability for the published or posted articles, news, and information and assume no responsibility for the accuracy or validity of the content.
Kalimpong News is a non-profit online news platform managed by KalimNews and operated under the Kalimpong Press Club.
Comment Policy:
We encourage respectful and constructive discussions. Please ensure decency while commenting and register with your email ID to participate.
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.