Supreme Court Clarifies Position on FIRs Related to NEET Protesters
The Supreme Court clarified that the expression "criminal antecedents" in its earlier order referred only to persons involved in grave and heinous offences and said states were at liberty to close or withdraw FIRs against the remaining student protesters in accordance with law.
The clarification came after the Centre told the court it was committed to not pursuing cases against students who participated in the NEET paper leak protests, including the July 20 Parliament march in Delhi, provided they did not have criminal antecedents. The matter will be heard again on August 18.
CJP chief spokesperson Saurav Das said the apex court's order had removed the confusion over the government's commitment not to proceed against protesters, except those accused in grave and heinous offences.
"Now that the Supreme Court has removed confusions, we expect the Government of India and all BJP/NDA-ruled states to immediately honour the assurances given on July 25 to the youth of this country," Das said in a post on X.
Later, addressing a press conference after the hearing, Das said the court had clarified that states were free to withdraw FIRs against student protesters and that the expression "criminal antecedents" referred only to those accused of heinous crimes such as murder and rape.
"Today there has been another big victory of the youth. The Supreme Court clarified that if the state has to withdraw all the FIRs against students and protesters, then it can do so. It also made it clear that only those accused of grave crimes such as murder and rape can face action in future," he said.
Das said the CJP had been in constant touch with senior representatives of the Union government and would closely monitor the implementation of the assurances.
"From Day 1, the Cockroach Janta Party has stood by every student and every protester, providing legal assistance, medical support, and every other form of help within our means. The youth of this country honoured their word. It is now time for the government to honour its own immediately," he said.
CJP spokesperson Ratna Singh said the Supreme Court had also indicated that it could invoke Article 142 of the Constitution to quash FIRs if required.
0 Response to "Supreme Court Clarifies Position on FIRs Related to NEET Protesters"
Post a Comment
Disclaimer Note:
The views expressed in the articles published here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy, position, or perspective of Kalimpong News or KalimNews. Kalimpong News and KalimNews disclaim all liability for the published or posted articles, news, and information and assume no responsibility for the accuracy or validity of the content.
Kalimpong News is a non-profit online news platform managed by KalimNews and operated under the Kalimpong Press Club.
Comment Policy:
We encourage respectful and constructive discussions. Please ensure decency while commenting and register with your email ID to participate.
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.