Confusion Over UPSC Rank 301 as Two Candidates with Same Name Claim the Position
![]() |
| Akanksha of Ghazipur (L) & Ara (R) |
The dispute centres on the 301st rank, with both candidates named Akanksha Singh staking claim to the position.
On one hand, Akanksha Singh from Ara in Bihar, granddaughter of Brahmeshwar Singh, founder of the banned militia Ranvir Sena, has been widely reported to have secured the rank. Singh was murdered in 2012.
On the other hand, another candidate, also named Akanksha Singh from Ghazipur in Uttar Pradesh, has claimed that the rank belongs to her.
The row intensified after an admit card circulating on social media appeared to show the same name and roll number, further complicating the matter.
With conflicting claims emerging, attention is now on the Union Public Service Commission for an official clarification.
Speaking to reporters on Friday, Brahmeshwar Singh’s granddaughter Akanksha claimed that she secured the 301st rank in the UPSC Civil Services Examination 2025 in her second attempt.
“I was confident about securing the result this time around. This was my grandfather’s dream. He had a lot of belief in me,” she said.
Akanksha said she studied for eight to 10 hours daily during her preparation.
“I used to study 8–10 hours a day. My parents played a great role in my success. Last year, when I failed to clear the exam, they kept supporting me without any frustration or anger,” she said.
Meanwhile, another Akanksha Singh from Ghazipur posted on Facebook alleging impersonation.
“It has come to light that my rank and identity are being impersonated by others,” she wrote, attaching two documents that she claimed were her original ID and e-summon in the FB post.
In a video, Ghazipur’s Akanksha said, “I am a gynaecologist by profession, currently practising at AIIMS Patna. I have come to know that another girl is claiming the 301st rank. This video is just for clarification. If one scans the QR code on both the admit cards, the matter will be very clear.”
She claimed that she appeared in all three exams — prelims, mains and PT — with the same roll number.
“I am confident about that and, at the same time, very humbled that my name has come in the list,” she added.
Following the appeal by the Ghazipur aspirant, multiple private channels scanned the QR codes present on the admit cards of both girls.
In the admit cards retrieved through scanning the QR codes, the roll number linked to the 301st rank reportedly matched with that of the Ghazipur aspirant, and not the Ara girl.
An official clarification on the controversy is still awaited.
KalimNews: The controversy over the 301st rank in the Civil Services Examination conducted by the Union Public Service Commission has intensified after one of the claimants, Dr Akanksha Singh from Ghazipur in Uttar Pradesh, presented documents to support her claim.
Dr Singh, who had been preparing for the exam in Delhi, shared her admit card and other records with media outlets and released a video explaining her position.
A gynaecologist by profession, she holds a master’s degree from All India Institute of Medical Sciences Patna.
In the video, she said: “My name is Dr Akanksha Singh. I have secured the 301st rank in UPSC 2025. I have learned that another girl is claiming this rank. The truth will be revealed by the barcode on the admit card. I just want to enjoy this moment.”
Her statement has further intensified the debate over who actually secured the rank.
Roll Number at the Centre of the Dispute
The controversy revolves around roll number 0856794, which appears on the admit cards associated with both candidates named Akanksha Singh.
When the admit cards were examined, a key discrepancy emerged:
-
The admit card of the Ghazipur-based claimant displays roll number 0856794.
-
When the barcode on her admit card was scanned, it also reportedly showed the same roll number (0856794).
However, the situation appeared different in the case of the Ara Bihar-based claimant.
-
Her admit card also shows roll number 0856794 on the surface.
-
But when the barcode was scanned, it reportedly displayed a different number.
This mismatch has raised serious questions about the authenticity of the documents and whether there may have been an error or identity misuse.
Bihar Candidate Stands Firm
Meanwhile, the other claimant, Akanksha Singh from Ara in Bihar, has maintained that she expected to clear the examination and insists the rank belongs to her.
She has said that securing a place in the merit list was always her goal and that she hopes to join the Indian Foreign Service.
Awaiting UPSC Clarification
The UPSC has not yet issued an official statement on the matter.
Given the confusion over the identical name and roll number, observers expect the Commission to conduct verification and release a clarification soon to settle the dispute.
0 Response to "Confusion Over UPSC Rank 301 as Two Candidates with Same Name Claim the Position"
Post a Comment
Disclaimer Note:
The views expressed in the articles published here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy, position, or perspective of Kalimpong News or KalimNews. Kalimpong News and KalimNews disclaim all liability for the published or posted articles, news, and information and assume no responsibility for the accuracy or validity of the content.
Kalimpong News is a non-profit online news platform managed by KalimNews and operated under the Kalimpong Press Club.
Comment Policy:
We encourage respectful and constructive discussions. Please ensure decency while commenting and register with your email ID to participate.
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.