CJI Recuses from Hearing on EC Appointments Law
"I will be accused of conflict of interest. There is a conflict of interest," the CJI, who was sitting alongside Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M. Pancholi, said at the outset.
The bench was hearing PILs challenging the validity of certain provisions of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, on the ground that it excluded the Chief Justice of India from the selection panel responsible for appointing the CEC and the ECs.
The CJI said it would be appropriate for the case to be heard by a bench where no judge is in line to become the Chief Justice. Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for one of the petitioners, supported the CJI's view.
Bhushan suggested that the matter be placed before a bench without any prospective Chief Justice to avoid any perception of bias. "I personally don't have any problem, but it can be listed before a bench not having a prospective CJI," Bhushan said.
Accepting the suggestion, the CJI directed that the matter be listed before another bench on April 7 and indicated that the new bench would comprise judges who are not in line to assume the office of the CJI.
0 Response to " CJI Recuses from Hearing on EC Appointments Law"
Post a Comment
Disclaimer Note:
The views expressed in the articles published here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy, position, or perspective of Kalimpong News or KalimNews. Kalimpong News and KalimNews disclaim all liability for the published or posted articles, news, and information and assume no responsibility for the accuracy or validity of the content.
Kalimpong News is a non-profit online news platform managed by KalimNews and operated under the Kalimpong Press Club.
Comment Policy:
We encourage respectful and constructive discussions. Please ensure decency while commenting and register with your email ID to participate.
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.