
What are the key changes proposed in the Waqf Amendment Bill? A look at the key changes proposed in the revised Bill
Don't Miss
The revised Bill incorporates contentious amendments based on the recommendations of a Joint Parliamentary Committee
The Hindu, April 03, 2025 : The Union Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju tabled the Waqf (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday (April 2, 2025), amid uproar by the Opposition.
Retention of ‘waqf by user’ properties
The original version of the Bill abolished the concept of “waqf by user” — a doctrine rooted in Islamic legal traditions that recognised properties as religious or charitable endowments based on their uninterrupted communal use, even in the absence of formal documentation. Historically, numerous mosques, graveyards, shrines, and other religious sites were established through oral declarations or customary practices, with their waqf status legitimised by continuous public usage over generations.
Key provision in Waqf (Amendment) Bill likely to mandate no change in ownership of existing properties unless facing dispute.
The JPC report cautioned that dismantling this doctrine could destabilise the legal standing of such properties, many of which have been informally managed by local communities for decades.
Accordingly, the revised Bill now clarifies that “waqf by user” properties registered on or before the law’s commencement will retain their status unless disputed or designated as government property. This amendment seeks to assuage concerns that the law’s retrospective application could abruptly strip existing properties of their protected status.
Nevertheless, apprehensions persist regarding a provision mandating that individuals must “show or demonstrate that [they have] been practicing Islam for at least five years” to establish a waqf. Critics have argued that this requirement arbitrarily excludes potential donors, particularly recent converts who may wish to endow property for religious or charitable purposes.
Allies support Waqf Bill, JD(U) urges government to not implement with retrospective effect
Non-muslim representation
The new Bill retains provisions allowing non-Muslims to be appointed to key waqf institutions, including the Central Waqf Council, State Waqf Boards, and waqf tribunals. It authorises the Centre to nominate three Members of Parliament—two from the Lok Sabha and one from the Rajya Sabha—to the Central Waqf Council without requiring them to be Muslims. Additionally, the Bill permits the appointment of a non-Muslim Chief Executive Officer and mandates that State governments include at least two non-Muslim members on the Waqf Boards.
Incorporating a recommendation from the JPC, the Bill now specifies that the State government official serving on the Waqf Board must be a Joint Secretary-level officer “dealing with waqf matters”. Notably, non-Muslims will remain a minority in both the Council and the Waqf Boards.
Amendment to Waqf Act proposes inclusion of non-Muslims and Muslim women in Waqf boards; strips the Board of powers to declare a property as waqf
The composition of waqf tribunals has also been revised, expanding them from a two-member to a three-member body. Each tribunal will now include a district judge, a joint secretary-level officer from the State government, and an expert in Muslim law and jurisprudence. The Bill also clarifies that tribunals constituted before the law’s enactment will continue to function until the tenure of their chairperson and members expires.
Opposition parties have argued that these changes could encroach upon the community’s constitutionally protected right to manage its religious affairs. However, the government has maintained that the inclusion of non-Muslims in waqf institutions is designed to enhance expertise and transparency without diminishing community representation.
Surveys by senior government officers
Under the previous version of the Bill, district collectors or officers of equivalent rank were authorised to survey waqf properties. However, based on the JPC’s recommendations, the amended Bill now mandates that senior officers above the rank of district collectors conduct these surveys, particularly in cases where government ownership is disputed.
Waqf amendment Bill introduces District Collector as an arbiter to decide whether a property is a Waqf or government land
Additionally, the revised Bill designates these senior government officers as the final arbiters in such disputes, replacing the waqf tribunals prescribed under the 1995 Act. It also bars the classification of a property as waqf until the officer submits a final report. If the officer determines that a property belongs to the government, they must update revenue records and report to the State government. The government will then instruct the Waqf Board to amend its records accordingly.
The government’s rationale for implementing this crucial change and centralising decision-making within the state bureaucracy is the alleged misuse of waqf laws. During parliamentary proceedings, Mr. Rijiju criticised the UPA government’s decision to transfer 123 waqf properties in the capital to the Delhi Waqf Board in the final days of its tenure. The Centre had previously constituted a two-member committee headed by Justice (retired) S.P. Garg to reassess this decision.
Registration portal
To enhance the accuracy of waqf property records, the revised Bill retains provisions for establishing a centralised registration system. Under this system, all information regarding waqf properties must be uploaded to a designated portal within six months of the law’s enactment. Additionally, any new waqf property registrations must be submitted exclusively through this portal to the respective Waqf Boards.
However, the revised Bill introduces a concession allowing the concerned waqf tribunal to extend the six-month deadline. If a muttawali (custodian) submits an application demonstrating sufficient cause for failing to file the property details within the stipulated period, the tribunal may grant an extension for a duration it deems appropriate.
0 Response to "What are the key changes proposed in the Waqf Amendment Bill? A look at the key changes proposed in the revised Bill"
Post a Comment
Disclaimer Note:
The views expressed in the articles published here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy, position, or perspective of Kalimpong News or KalimNews. Kalimpong News and KalimNews disclaim all liability for the published or posted articles, news, and information and assume no responsibility for the accuracy or validity of the content.
Kalimpong News is a non-profit online news platform managed by KalimNews and operated under the Kalimpong Press Club.
Comment Policy:
We encourage respectful and constructive discussions. Please ensure decency while commenting and register with your email ID to participate.
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.