-->
New weapon:  The amendments to the FCRA have introduced rigid red-tapism, inconveniencing a number of organizations

New weapon: The amendments to the FCRA have introduced rigid red-tapism, inconveniencing a number of organizations

Don't Miss

Critics say that the evidence of harassment of specific non-government organizations through the weaponization of the FCRA is compelling
The home ministry's statement said the Missionaries of Charity’s application for renewal of FCRA licence was refused on December 25, 2021, for not meeting the eligibility conditions.: File photo
The Editorial Board   |   TT  |  30.12.21 : The Yuletide spirit has turned sour under the watch of the Narendra Modi government, once again. “Adverse inputs”, the Union home ministry argued, led to the denial of the renewal of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act licence of the Missionaries of Charity, a philanthropic organization founded by Mother Teresa that has a long and distinguished record of rendering humanitarian services. The grounds of the action seem specious. There is some talk of the Gujarat police investigating an allegation of conversion against the organization, a charge that has been denied. There is a law in place for violations, financial or otherwise. The responsibility of providing evidence of alleged irregularities, if any, lies with the accuser. But the Centre is being evasive. The air must be cleared and the charges proved or thrown out at the earliest. The lack of transparency on the government’s part, coming in the wake of sustained attacks on India’s Christian community by right-wing vigilantes, would only strengthen suspicions of mischief.

Critics say that the evidence of harassment of specific non-government organizations through the weaponization of the FCRA is compelling. The amendments to the FCRA have introduced rigid red-tapism, inconveniencing a number of organizations, especially smaller NGOs, whose relief work depends largely on foreign contributions. The International Commission of Jurists had requested the president not to pass the amended FCRA, but to no avail. The numbers, since then, have told a telling story. In March 2020, Parliament was informed that as many as 6,676 licences had not been renewed during a three-year period. Amnesty International, The Lawyers Collective, Greenpeace India and now Missionaries of Charity have found themselves in the line of vision of the State’s red eye. The consequences have been predictable: aggravated suffering for marginalized communities who have been especially dependent on NGOs because of the ravages of the pandemic; the crackdown against civil society has further sullied India’s commitment to the democratic charter on international fora. Perhaps the real grouse of the government lies with its fear of the rhetoric of development — vikas — being torpedoed by the proof gathered by grassroots organizations in touch with ground realities.

Related Posts

0 Response to "New weapon: The amendments to the FCRA have introduced rigid red-tapism, inconveniencing a number of organizations"

Post a Comment

Disclaimer Note:
The views expressed in the articles published here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy, position, or perspective of Kalimpong News or KalimNews. Kalimpong News and KalimNews disclaim all liability for the published or posted articles, news, and information and assume no responsibility for the accuracy or validity of the content.
Kalimpong News is a non-profit online news platform managed by KalimNews and operated under the Kalimpong Press Club.

Comment Policy:
We encourage respectful and constructive discussions. Please ensure decency while commenting and register with your email ID to participate.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.