
Kashmir protest: How the government version changed After four days of denial, home ministry says miscreants on August 9 threw stones at security forces, but there was no firing

The BBC had put out a video on August 10 saying that there were large protests at Saura in Srinagar the previous day where arms firing was heard. The BBC video had shown several hundreds gathered for the protest.
The news agency Reuters also reported the incident. But for four days, official reactions from Delhi and Srinagar reported peace in Kashmir and small disturbances where not more than 20 people were involved. There was no mention of "miscreants" or stone throwing.
The ministry today reiterated that "no bullets have been fired in #JammuAndKashmir since the development related to #Article370."
Below is a timeline of what happened on August 9, according to the international media present in Jammu and Kashmir, and how government agencies reacted to reports till today.
Friday, August 9
Curfew restrictions were relaxed in Kashmir for Friday prayers. People weren’t allowed to offer prayers in the main Jama Masjid in Srinagar, but in local mosques.
The same day, a Reuters report said that the “Indian police used tear gas and pellets to fight back at least 10,000 people protesting” in Srinagar's Saura after they took to the streets following the Friday prayers. The report mentioned a police officer and two witnesses as information sources. Al Jazeera, the Gulf-based televesion netwwork, too published a report mentioning Saura.
That night, Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the nation justifying the scrapping of Jammu and Kashmir special status.
Saturday, August 10
The Twitter handle of the spokesperson, ministry of home affairs, denied reports of protests in Kashmir the previou day. It specifically denied reports by Reuters and The Dawn, a Pakistani newspaper. “This is completely fabricated & incorrect. There have been a few stray protests in Srinagar/Baramulla and none involved a crowd of more than 20 ppl,” the tweet read.
A news report originally published in Reuters and appeared in Dawn claims there was a protest involving 10000 people in Srinagar.
This is completely fabricated & incorrect. There have been a few stray protests in Srinagar/Baramulla and none involved a crowd of more than 20 ppl.
A New York Times report also claimed that Indian forces had opened fire on peaceful demonstrators.
The same day, BBC uploaded video footage of the protests in Saura. “The BBC witnessed the police opening fire and using tear gas to disperse the crowd. Despite that, the Indian government has said the protest never took place,” its report said. BBC South Asia bureau chief, Nicola Careem tweeted the video. (https://twitter.com/NicolaCareem/status/1160107113890426880) https://twitter.com/NicolaCareem/status/1160107113890426880
The state machinery went into overdrive after that to show that the situation in Kashmir is normal.
A video on Doordarshan showed national security advisor Ajit Doval interacting with local people in Anantnag. Another video, shared by Prasar Bharati, showed people offering prayers in a Srinagar mosque. It also shared another video of the traffic claiming that “contrary to some fake news reports, it's business as usual in Srinagar.” A special program on DD reported the valley has returned to normalcy.
The Srinagar district magistrate Shahid Choudhary shared photos of functional ATMs and people queued outside it. At night, the All India Radio News shared a video uploaded by Imtiyaz Hussain, a Jammu and Kashmir police officer showing local people out and about in different parts of Srinagar, Ganderbal, Baramulla, Pulwama and Budgam. The video was soon debunked on social media as a fake.
Sunday, August 11
The inspector-general of Kashmir, Swayam Prakash Pani, issued a statement clarifying: “The report is wrong. Non such incident has taken place in the valley. The valley has remained largely peaceful over the last one week.”
The home ministry spokesperson shared another statement by chief secretary and the Jammu and Kashmir police chief that claimed the police had “not fired a single bullet in the 6 days”.
BBC News, however, stood by its story and video from Kashmir.
Monday, August 12
The home ministry and several other state-backed handles shared photos of Kashmiris offering Id prayers in different parts of the state. The home ministry handle also gave counts of the number of people that had gathered in different places to pray.
Tuesday, August 13
The government admitted that tere had been a protest on August 9, but insisted that security forces did not open fire on anyone.
“On 09/08, miscreants mingled with people returning home after prayers at a local mosque. They resorted to unprovoked stone pelting against law enforcement forces to cause widespread unrest,” tweeted the MHA spokesperson. “Law enforcement authorities showed restraint and tried to maintain law & order situation. It is reiterated that no bullets have been fired in #JammuAndKashmir since the development related to #Article370.”
BBC’s Careem tweeted on the government’s acknowledgement of the incident. “Careful to say ‘bullets’ not fired. No clarification on which weapons or ammunition were used,” Careem wrote.
0 Response to "Kashmir protest: How the government version changed After four days of denial, home ministry says miscreants on August 9 threw stones at security forces, but there was no firing"
Post a Comment
Disclaimer Note:
The views expressed in the articles published here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy, position, or perspective of Kalimpong News or KalimNews. Kalimpong News and KalimNews disclaim all liability for the published or posted articles, news, and information and assume no responsibility for the accuracy or validity of the content.
Kalimpong News is a non-profit online news platform managed by KalimNews and operated under the Kalimpong Press Club.
Comment Policy:
We encourage respectful and constructive discussions. Please ensure decency while commenting and register with your email ID to participate.
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.