Gurung severs ties with State Govt- Is it a right step?
Hillman The Analyst, KalimNews, Kalimpong, 19 September 2015: Apropos
The Statesman, North Bengal & Sikkim Plus 15 Sept 2015 heading “Gurung
severs ties with State Govt” without rhyme or reason is an indication of the
belief that the GJM leader is not familiar with the ground realities existing
at the moment.
Whereas the CM West Bengal now the ex-officio Chairperson of
Tribes Advisory Council (TAC), a statutory body under the Fifth Schedule of
the Constitution of India the provisions of which has been imposed in West
Bengal since 2012 and functioning since then. This is a very powerful body
mandated by the Constitution of India under Rule 4 of the Fifth Schedule and
which had been diluted to the point of ‘extinction’ in 1956 while in its stead
the State of West Bengal was incarnated and running the roost (State) since
then.
Till 2012 it had literally vanished into thin air but that was not to be
- as the Constitution (the President) happened to be the guardian angel
protecting the Sikkimese Darjeeling District from being obliterated by
the State. Interestingly political historians may note that the Sikkimese
identity of Darjeeling District is preserved within the four corners of the
Constitution (Fifth Schedule).
By this perceptive it is also now alluded on
logical premise that the State of Sikkim also happens to fall within the
provisions of the Fifth Schedule. Accordingly the native Sikkimese and
Sikkimese Darjeeling citizens are protected by Fifth Schedule and Art.371
contextually under the heading of Chapter XXI of the Constitution, Temporary,
Transitional and Special Provisions. Under these pretexts Sikkim was merged
into the Indian Union and therefore it implies Darjeeling District (an Absorbed
Area) presumably formerly part of Sikkim requires to be integrated into the
Union under Art.371 provisions. These factors are well known to the CM, West
Bengal who is constitutionally playing the defined Fifth Schedule program as
TAC Chairperson and looking into the development and welfare of the Scheduled
Tribes as per Art. 275(1) on basis of which Central Funds area allocated for
the same purpose.
Without
being educated on the above constitutional precepts, seems to be the problem
Bimal is facing however though ignorantly it is presumed. He has to be advised
in clarification in understanding the implications of the Fifth Schedule which
is now in operation, live and kicking, and which eventually will become an
adult meaning statehood in the proper time and moment. The implications of the
Fifth Schedule and its eventual target in the Constitution is well known to the
veteran MP SS Ahluwalia who has deliberated on the Fifth Schedule and Sixth
Schedule issues elaborately explaining the difference between the two as to why
the former applies to the autonomy demand of the hill peoples of Darjeeling
District of West Bengal (and rest of India) while the Sixth Schedule only
applies to the Northeast states.
Some hill political units still seem to be
clinging on to the Sixth Schedule for their political survival pending the
Assembly elections in 2016. They too should broad base their political program
to the larger issue of statehood demand under the Fifth Schedule which is now
presently in vogue, loud and clear, but seems to be inaudible and blind to
certain deaf ears and blind eyes seems to be the height of ignorance. Or is it
just a sham to cover up the past misdeeds. Instead of repenting for past
actions which may have occurred out of total ignorance and plight is no
justification for retributive attitude. This mindset needs readdressed and tune
into a more definitive mood of peaceful compliance to the present situation
implied by the function of the Fifth Schedule which is singularly effective now
to eventually target the application of Darjeeling District (GTA) into a
Scheduled Area. This legality will finally provide the right to demand
statehood. Infact this process is already pending before both houses of
Parliament as discoursed in this writer’s article/s.
Therefore
Bimal require to buckle his pants and tighten his belt in taking the Fifth
Schedule provision further and tightening his hold over the GTA which by the
way is also a constitutionally programmed intermediate body till final
UT/statehood target is achieved. He should remain calm and steady and not upset
his mind by opposition forces particularly the State who doubtless is playing
his cards within its limits to disturb the division of West Bengal, however
albeit at the cost of the Sikkimese Darjeeling hill peoples.
This writer has
intentionally projected the term Sikkimese Darjeeling as more near the truth as
Gorkha/Nepali seems probably disoriented – as the statehood demand is implicit
to the Sikkimese Darjeeling hill peoples whether Scheduled Tribes or non
Scheduled Tribes is not the issue when the final deal is closed. Therefore the
right path as far as the Constitution of India is concerned that Bimal should
take is the demand for a State for the Partially Excluded Area of Darjeeling
District and the adjoining Dooars maybe the right attitude. Infact after log use of Gorkha/Gorkhaland
terminology the word is losing its sheen despite it being polished by two
political agitations (GNLF & GJM) and other such demands by political
parties earlier. The result has simply created a lot of backlog in management
of the civil society at large in contrast to Sikkim being the parent state
which has advanced remarkably ahead of Darjeeling District in development
terms.
While
Sikkim has left beyond Darjeeling district inspite of the fact that Darjeeling
district is an acceded territory obviously require to play a parental role in guiding
Darjeeling District to its eventual goal in union with India just as it has
done for itself. This is critical from the point of view o international
understanding. That Sikkimese Darjeeling
legally is still part of Sikkim.
This is conspicuously displayed by the fact the Limbu and Tamang were listed as
STs under the Constitution of India (Art.342) in 2002/03 is a message loud and
clear which even the dumb and blind are to realise if not to understand the
implications.
Therefore
taking the above understanding into preview Bimal is advised to play a more
proactive role with understanding and care to survive the onslaughts of the
State maneuvers under the CM who happens to be a political figure and
distributing sweets to the children obviously to curtail their wailings. More
such doles under the garb of development and cultural boards will be hand out
as largesse till the time of elections in 2016. Accordingly Bimal should rise
above board and meet this challenge peaceful and cooperatively without anger
and despite but as a leader seeking the legal rights of the people and not
losing sight of the road ahead. Attempts to coy him doubtless will be
experimented by the state at all costs and hence not lose his cool but play his
card steady and undistracted in defining his program according to the books
(constitution) and not parasitic advises. Hope for the best.
Karma T.Pempahishey is the Hillman -The Analyst and a freelance columnist.
0 Response to " Gurung severs ties with State Govt- Is it a right step?"
Post a Comment
Disclaimer Note:
The views expressed in the articles published here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy, position, or perspective of Kalimpong News or KalimNews. Kalimpong News and KalimNews disclaim all liability for the published or posted articles, news, and information and assume no responsibility for the accuracy or validity of the content.
Kalimpong News is a non-profit online news platform managed by KalimNews and operated under the Kalimpong Press Club.
Comment Policy:
We encourage respectful and constructive discussions. Please ensure decency while commenting and register with your email ID to participate.
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.