ON SALE




ON SALE
19 decimal private land with a House
at Sabitri Ghising Road, Bong Busty Kalimpong.
Single storied house has 3 Bedrooms,
Living room, Kitchen & Dining room,
3 Bathroom-cum-toilets
Contact: thulungakrai@gmail.com
or 9434131719


27 Jul 2017

The privacy paradigm... India needs unequivocal clarity on whether its citizens have the right to privacy,

SANJEEB PANIGRAHI, SNS, 27 July 2017: The issue of whether Right of Privacy is a fundamental right under the Constitution is being heard by a nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India and has a direct bearing on the Court's mandate to examine the Constitutional validity of the Aadhaar scheme.
The definition of Right to Privacy varies according to the perceptions and contexts in which it is used however, its simplest definition is the right to be left alone. Its diverse manifestations include protection of one's honour reputation, not to be eavesdropped, one's home being one's castle, personal belongings and data being inviolable, personal choice in all aspects of living, a protective arc against arbitrary intrusions and so on.
Although the Right a Privacy is not explicit in the Constitution of India, it is a subject matter of judicial interpretation. In the United States, courts did not protect this right until the end of the 19th century.
Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis (1890) developed the concept of privacy; and wrote that privacy is the 'right to be let alone". Many cases related to right to privacy came before them Courts in the United States for adjudication and the first American Court to deal with this tight was the New York Appellate Court in Roberson vs. Rochester Folding Box Co.(1902). Chief justice Parker ruled that the defendants had invaded the Plaintiff's right coined as 'right to privacy'.
In modern India, the first time the issue of right to privacy was discussed and debated in the Constituent Assembly was by K.S. Karimuddin who moved an Amendment on the lines of the US Constitutions which eventually failed.
The concept of privacy can be traced back to the ancient Hindu era, According to Hitopadesha, certain matters like worship, sex and family matters etc. should be protected from disclosure. Ancient Indian law-givers declared "Sarve sve sve sve griha raja" (Every man is a king in his awn house). In the Mahabharata Draupadi was the common wife of the five Pandavas and they accorded utmost priority to privacy by framing a rule to avoid embarrassment if by chance, any of them happened to see Draupadi in company of any brother he would have to undergo banishment for 12 years in the forest as a 'Bramhachari'
Right to privacy is an amorphous and protean concept that emerges from values and principles evolved by the Courts in the form of case laws over so many years. The Supreme Court, through a catena of judgments, has asserted that Article 21 is the heart of the fundamental rights and is multi-dimensional. A combined reading of the observations by Constitutional Benches of the Supreme Court in MP Sharma vs. Satish Chandra (1954) and Kharak Singh vs. States of UP (1903) can lead to the conclusion that no fundamental right to privacy exists in our Constitution.
But through later judgments in Gobind (1975) and  Maneka Gandhi (seven judges, 1978), the Apex Court has enunciated that right to privacy is embedded in our jurisprudential foundation. Following these two path breaking judgments, many judicial pronouncements have iterated the existence  of the right to privacy under Part III of the Constitution. These include Malak (1981), Rajagopal (1994), PUCL(1997), District Registrar (2005), SUchita 920090. SeLvi (2015) and Nalsa (2014).
In the year 2002, the National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution recommended amending the Constitution to include a slew of new rights including the Right to Privacy which would be numbered Article 21B and would read as follows; "21-B (1) every person has a right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondences (2) Nothing in clause (1) shall prevent the State from making any law imposing reasonable restriction on the exercise of the right conferred by clause (1), in the interests of the security of the State, public safety or for the prevention of disorder or crime, or for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others."
Thus the Right to Privacy although not expressly found in the Constitution, is deeply engrained in Part III of the Constitution and detraction from the same is constitutionally impermisssible.
Unlike the Constitution which has not expressly recognised Right to Privacy, the said right has been acknowledged in various statues, both pre- and post Constitutional, which maintain that the right to privacy is sacrosanct and special procedures have been established in such laws to create any curb or fetter on any aspect of the tight to privacy. Reference is made to the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, Information Technology Act, 2009 to name a few.
Presently, India does not have a sui-generis statute that safeguards privacy horizontally. In 2011, the UPA government finalised a draft Bill on privacy and set up a Committee of Experts headed by Justice AP Shah to, among other things, "study the privacy laws and related Bills promulgated by, various countries" and "to make specific sugges¬ions for consideration of the Government".The panel recommended a new law to protect privacy and personal data in the private and public spheres, and the appointment of privacy commissioners at the Centre and in statues. It listed nine principles of privacy, as also main exceptions to the right to privacy - such as national security, public order, disclosure in public interest, prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of criminal offences and protection of the rights of freedom of others.
The Government of India, speaking through its Attorney-General has reiterated its position that Indian citizens have no constitutional right of privacy. The poor, who are the beneficiaries of so many government welfare schemes including continuance of subsidy payments and other benefits must be prepared to surrender their right of privacy, if any, in order to receive the benefits. But India needs to resolve the Aadhaar controversy by recognising the importance of Aadhaar for efficient-and honest delivery of welfare schemes without compromising the right to privacy of the citizens.
Most modern democratic nations are constantly striving to strike a fine balance between personal privacy and public safety. There is a misplaced apprehension and flawed logic in Government's position on this issue that if the right to privacy is elevated to the status of Fundamental Rights, the government will be impotent and the said right would flake the citizens inviolable and invincible.
India is waiting for an unequivocal and a definitive clarity on this vital aspect which is still in the legal womb.
The writer, is a Supreme Court Advocate.

Digg Google Bookmarks reddit Mixx StumbleUpon Technorati Yahoo! Buzz DesignFloat Delicious BlinkList Furl

0 comments: on "The privacy paradigm... India needs unequivocal clarity on whether its citizens have the right to privacy, "

Post a Comment

Kalimpong News is a non-profit online News of Kalimpong Press Club managed by KalimNews. It is published simultaneously in this site as well as http://kalimpongnews.net.
Please be decent while commenting and register yourself with your email id. Your id will be kept secret, as far as practicable.

Popular Posts